Monday, May 11, 2009

Why Won't the Mullahs Be Content With Their Mosques, Damn It!?


Secularism is the fad today, and to call for any religious affiliations within a political organization is completely outdated. We, the young generation, associate religious political movements with tyranny, dictatorships, and loss of human rights. We think religion, whether it be revealed or not, should know its place, and stay in the places of worship. We won't let religion walk through the doors of parliaments, presidential offices, and judge's courts.

It seems that most other religions have accepted this. The Church doesn't mess with what countries do, neither do Rabbis, or Buddhist and Hindu monks. Not usually anyways. Except Muslim scholars, the so-called 'Mullahs', who still believe that Islam has a place with in the operation of the governments of modern countries. For a lot of us who believe in secularism it is rather incredible how the Mullahs are so hotheaded regarding this, and simply won't be content with their mosques.

To be fair, the fear of Mullahs can be said to be for good reason. The image portrayed by the media of Islam is scary enough. For many people of the world, the 9/11 terrorist attacks are synonyms of Islam. And truth be told, the attempts of Muslims to recover their image after the 9/11 attacks remain a gesture - too little, too late.

Worse, every one knows that there are certain countries where Muslims try to implement Islam without having sufficient knowledge of Islamic law, resulting in blundering failures that are in the end nothing more than tyrannies. After all, little knowledge is a very dangerous thing.

Even worse still, the rise of certain groups of Muslims who believe that the only way to save the Muslim Ummah from the unbelievable lowly state it's in is by waging war against the whole world at large has done the Mullahs, and even Muslims in general, no favor. The result has been a confusion between terrorist groups and Muslim political organizations who want to work through the democratic system and Muslim freedom fighters who took up arms only after having made failed attempts at diplomacy.

Having said all this, what makes Mullahs so adamant in their belief that they don't have to do what the Church and the Rabbis did?

I bet you've heard this enough times already, but Islam is a complete way of life. Sure enough, other religions are also a complete way of life in a sense. I say 'In a sense,' because they focus more on formulating a set moral guidelines, where as Islam has come with a more sophisticated legal framework. It is an uncontested fact that the Islamic state established by the Prophet (PBUH) and later ruled by his rightly guided Caliphs (may Allah be pleased with them) was the first nation in recorded history to have developed such a sophisticated legal system, all of which was based on religious teachings. Muslim scholars have elaborated on matters of constitutional, civil, personal, criminal laws, as well matters related to international relations.

Now, what makes these laws, that were formulated more than a century and a half ago suitable to the modern age that we're living in?

The most important factor that makes Islamic Shariah suitable for the modern age is the fact that it accepts custom, public interest, and in certain matters even individual benefit, as sources of law, or matters taken into consideration in the formulating of the law. Of course, customs and the interest of the public, differ from place to place, and from time to time. Individual benefits differ from person to person. Thus, Islamic law is more flexible than we initially might imagine it to be.

Of course, it must be kept in mind that these sources of law come secondary to the Qur'an and Sunnah. We, as Muslims, believe that the Qur'an is a divine revelation from Allah to the Messenger (PBUH) as a guidance for the whole mankind. The Qur'an is therefore the primary source of Islamic law followed by the traditions of the Prophet (PBUH). And these two primary sources provide the guidelines that we must abide by in following the secondary sources of law. As a matter of fact, there's a whole science around the methods of deriving laws from the texts of both the Qur'an and Sunnah as well as from the secondary sources of Islamic law.

All this aside, there's another simple reason why the Mullahs and the Mullahs' followers like myself believe we simply cannot be content with our Mosques. Because the Qur'an and Sunnah has a complete set of rules, to simply be stuck in our mosques would be to work in accordance to around 25% of what has been revealed. We as Muslims have been ordered to live our whole lives in accordance to 100% of what has been revealed.

To follow Islam is to follow Islam in our every day. To pray in the mosque. To go out to the street and be able to relate to the problems we face there. To have the ability to guide the society. To have the guts to be able to lead the society. That's why the Mullahs won't be content with their mosques, damn it!

9 comments:

  1. What a waste of time reading this crap

    ReplyDelete
  2. this is a very good article. We need this kind of thinking among Muslims. At the moment, the salafiyya educated fundamentalists are giving Islam a bad name.

    ReplyDelete
  3. agree with anon above

    y say such nice things about diplomacy n secularism when the end game is "shariah law is the thing & we wouldn't compromise an inch, damn it!!"

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for the comments.

    First of all, I believe it's a wrong perception to always associate with diplomacy with secularism. Secularism simply means to separate the state from religion. Even communist socialism promotes secular thought. When Mao Zedong's communist forces forced the Chinese people to renounce their religions and then established one of the hardest countries to deal with in world diplomacy even that was secularism.

    The only 'nice' thing I said about secularism is that it is the fad today.

    I do believe it is really important for the Muslims and for the world at large to appreciate the fact that Shari'ah is what brought us to where we are today. Those who read further in this blog would realize that Shari'ah is not what is being portrayed in the world media by people who know so little of what Shari'ah actually is.

    I also refuse to put the blame on any certain group of Muslims for the simple reason that I don't believe in stereotyping. Those who did wrong will realize what they did, by Allah's will. I believe forward thinking demands of us to not try to put blame, but instead try to find solutions. Inshallah we will.

    Thanks 'ahumadhu' for the kind words. :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. if you look at Maldives, we can very clearly see the point you are making. We were a very religious and spiritual community for a very long time until the former president who turned out to be a dictator started mixing religion with politics. And look at our political domain and religious life today. This would not have happened if Mullah's restricted themselves to the mosques and other domains of religion. But they wear the dress of religion only to be elected to political office and positions of power. A good example is the Adhaalath sheiks who now have formed a ministry and are fingering all areas of society that have nothing to do with them and about which they know nothing. They talk of Shairah, but approve of Maldivian resorts owned by Maldivians to sell alcohol, western women to run around naked... what kind of hypocrisy is this. But thank God Maldivians see these guys for their double standards and hypocrisy. After Sheikh Ilyaas' bid for the parliament, people now think he is a dishonest swindler. And that's why he was not elected.

    Very good article Aisha and keep up the good work.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks Azim for your opinion.

    Although I think you may have got my point wrong. The heading itself was not my opinion. My opinion is that 'domains of religion' to use your words include all domains of life. For the simple reason that I believe Islam is the complete package.
    As for the Islamic Affairs ministry and Adhaalath party, I believe they as a government institution and a political party are open to criticism. However, I don't see a problem in their decision to be in politics if they believe they can serve our religion and our country by doing so.

    Thanks again.

    ReplyDelete
  7. To ali azim:

    No, we were never 'very religious' or 'very spiritual'. The little that we know from our past from travelers like Ibn Batutta confirms this (women walking around topless is not what I'd call being very religious).

    I don't see anything wrong with having an Islamic political party. In fact, given the current political culture, I feel that it is a necessity. Our 'educated ignorance' make us believe that religious people should be confined to mosques and not be involved in any worldly affairs and people who've studied the sciences need to be religious. That's the problem right there.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Islam is a complete way of life. To call it just a religion is unfair, to say the least! It is of no surprise that we find in Maldives as well so-called Muslims who wants to 'modernise' the Dheen-to adopt a 'progressive' approach. Despite these people being a minority, they are a growing minority. A lot of intellectual thought and effort in a collective fashion needs to be brought in address these people properly. Maldivian youth, who lvoe the dheen and who are educated and intelligent, and use wisdom and patience, should be at the forefront of this ideological 'battle'....

    Keep up the good work!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Benefit is not a source of Islamic Shariah

    ReplyDelete